data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c7dfd/c7dfdbf40abee20b5c32e82a19877cabb9af429c" alt="Dr Swamy and Cpil through lawyer Prashant Bhushan claimed that the provision stood in the way of prosecution of corrupt officials in other instances."
The section was challenged by Dr Subramanium Swamy and NGO Cpil as violative of Article 14 of the constitution. A five-judge bench of the top court led by CJI R M Lodha on Tuesday struck it down as against the constitution.
The court has earlier clarified that the section was unnecessary in court monitored cases.
Dr Swamy and Cpil through lawyer Prashant Bhushan claimed that the provision stood in the way of prosecution of corrupt officials in other instances.
But the government had defended it as necessary to protect officers who take bonafide decisions in public interest from harassment.
No comments:
Post a Comment